EPR Workshop Revision · Modules 1 & 2

FY2026/27 National Nuclear & Radiological EPR Workshop

Revision pack for Abdub Galgallo (NuPEA). Speaker notes for every slide, likely questions with answers you can give, the numbers to know, and things to check before you present. It covers two decks: Presentation 1 (Module 1, 59 slides) and Presentation 2 (Module 2, 16 slides).

Module 1: Understanding EPR

The hazard, why we prepare, how a PWR works and fails, how an event is classified, planning zones, protective actions, the four-declaration scenario, and who does what. Aimed at people with no nuclear background.

Module 2: Where Kenya Stands

The legal and institutional review. Benchmarks, six tiers of legal force, today's framework, the scorecard, five structural gaps, and the fix through regulations under two existing Acts. Review date: 30 August 2026.

How to use this page

Click a slide card to open its notes. Questions start collapsed so you can test yourself before opening the answer. Search filters everything, and the ◐ button switches light and dark.

Module 1 in one sentence: Radiation emergencies are already possible in Kenya today, and EPR is the last line of defence. Response runs on criteria set in advance (categories, classes, zones, OILs), so on the day nobody has to improvise.
Module 2 in one sentence: Kenya has strong Acts and a complete technical draft. But the technical layer is not in force and the on-site and off-site sides are not connected. Most of this can be fixed with regulations under two Acts that already exist.

The golden thread between the two modules

Module 1 says the response needs…Module 2 finds that in Kenya…
Classification criteria written in advance (EALs)KNRA's duty to define them has existed since 2020 (NRA s.57(a)), but no criteria have been issued. This is the fastest fix available.
Generic criteria and OILs for protective actionsThese are drafted in the EPR Regulations 2021, which were never signed.
An off-site decision-maker to order public protective action at General EmergencyNo law designates one. Draft Reg. 14(19) assumes a body that no law creates (Gap 1).
A national coordinating mechanism (GSR Part 7 Req. 2)NERP 2020 and the NDRM Act 2026 never mention radiation, and KNRA and Health are not on the NDRMA Board.
Geographically targeted public alertingSMS tower alerting has been demonstrated but is not in law.
A dose regime for emergency workersIt is only in the draft. The NDRM s.55(2)(i) power to make it exists but has never been used, and EPREV R11 is still open.
A medical chain for casualtiesNo radiological triage exists for the public, and county health is devolved.

Module 1: Understanding EPR for Nuclear & Radiological Facilities

Speaker notes by slide. Where the deck splits one topic across "(continued)" slides, those slides share a card. Say is a script to talk from, Remember lists the facts you must get right, and is the line that takes you to the next slide.

S1Title Understanding EPR for Nuclear and Radiological Facilities
Say

"Welcome. This first module assumes no nuclear background. By the end you should be able to follow what happens, minute by minute, when something goes wrong at a nuclear or radiological facility, and see where your own institution fits."

"Everything here comes from the national EPR documentary baseline, and sources are cited on the slides. We use IAEA GSR Part 7 as the yardstick in all four modules."

Remember
  • This is Module 1 of 4. Module 2 is the legal review, Module 3 covers responders and dose control, and Module 4 is the proposal to close the gaps.
  • The room is multi-agency (health, police, counties, customs, and others), so keep jargon low.

"Here's the route we'll take."

S2Outline
Say

"The module has three movements. First, what the hazard is and why we prepare. Second, the machine: how a plant works, what is inside it, and how that material could reach people. Third, the response: how an emergency is declared, the zones, the protective actions, and who does what."

"The hinge is 'The Pivot'. Everything before it is about prevention and everything after it is about response."

"Let's start with what counts as an emergency. The list is wider than most people expect."

S3The hazard What counts as a nuclear or radiological emergency?
Say

"An emergency is any event that actually or potentially exposes the public, workers or the environment to ionising radiation. It is not only reactors."

"Kenya already lives with most of this list: sources in use, transport, orphan sources, and the risk of malicious use. There are more than 1,500 registered sources moving through hospitals, industry and roads today. The reactor scenarios are a future layer added on top of a hazard we already have."

Remember
  • The eight types: nuclear facilities (NPP, KNRR), sources in use, transport, orphan sources, malicious use (RDD, RED, IND), transboundary, satellite re-entry, and any other exposure event.
  • KNRR is the Kenya Nuclear Research Reactor (planned for about 2030).
  • RDD is a radiological dispersal device ("dirty bomb"). RED is a radiological exposure device (a hidden source). IND is an improvised nuclear device.

"So why build all of this before anything has happened?"

S4–5Why prepare EPR is the final level of defence in depth
Say

"Nuclear safety is organised as defence in depth. Barriers are stacked, and each one assumes the one before it can fail: safe design and siting, safe operation and regulation, accident prevention systems, and on-site mitigation. EPR sits under all of them."

"EPR is not a prediction that accidents will happen. It guarantees that if every other barrier fails, the public is still protected. That is why the IAEA requires EPR arrangements to be in place and exercised before a facility operates, not afterwards."

Remember
  • Read the quote on S5 slowly. Its key phrase is "the most important safety objective".
  • Know who wrote the S5 quote before you present (see Before you present).

"If EPR is the last barrier, what exactly must it achieve?"

S6What response must achieve The eight goals of emergency response
Say

"GSR Part 7 sets eight goals. The first ones are immediate: regain control, mitigate, prevent severe health effects, and treat the injured. The rest show that a response is judged over years, on health, environment, economy and public trust."

"Look at goal 6, non-radiological consequences. At Fukushima, panic, unwarranted evacuation, stigma and economic loss often did more harm than the radiation. Kenya must manage fear as deliberately as dose, and that is why public communication comes up throughout this series."

Remember
  • There are 8 goals. Deterministic effects are prevented; stochastic effects are reduced "to the extent practicable".
  • The last goal is to prepare for the resumption of normal social and economic activity, so recovery is part of the response.

"These goals come from an international rulebook. Here is what that rulebook contains."

S7The rulebook The international framework Kenya works within
Say

"GSR Part 7 (2015) is the master set of requirements. It has 26 requirements, addressed to government, the regulator and operators. It is co-sponsored by 13 international organisations, so it reaches health, food, aviation, maritime and policing, not only the nuclear sector. That is why this room holds far more than nuclear specialists."

"Below it sit the safety guides: GSG-2 on criteria, GS-G-2.1 on arrangements, GSG-11 on termination, GSG-14 on communication, and the EPR practical tools. Then there are the two 1986 conventions, the IAEA operational networks (USIE, RANET, the Incident and Emergency Centre), and peer reviews. Kenya hosted an EPREV mission in 2015."

"On the conventions, Kenya has already written the notification duty into law in NRA s.61. Module 2 comes back to treaty status."

Check first: this slide says Kenya is not party to either convention. Module 2 describes treaty status as unverified. Settle which statement is correct before you present (see Before you present).

"The rulebook does not treat every facility the same. It grades."

S8–10The graded approach Five Emergency Preparedness Categories
Say

"Under the graded approach, the preparedness effort scales with the hazard. There are five categories."

"Category I is nuclear power plants, where an on-site event could cause severe health effects off the site. That is our future Siaya plant, with construction from 2028 and commissioning in 2034. Category II covers research reactors and large-source facilities, where off-site doses could warrant urgent action but would not cause severe effects. That is the planned research reactor (about 2030) and large irradiators. Category III is smaller sources where action is needed on site only, such as hospital teletherapy, industrial radiography and cyclotrons. That applies now."

"Category IV is the one people miss. It applies to every State on earth: emergencies at unforeseeable locations such as lost sources, transport accidents and border detections. 'We have no reactor' has never meant 'we need no EPR'. Category V is areas near a foreign Category I or II facility, where the concern is contamination of food and commodities crossing the border."

"The 2015 EPREV reviewed Kenya as a Category III/IV State, and that is still our category today."

Remember
  • NOW: Cat III and Cat IV. SOON: Cat I (Siaya NPP) and Cat II (research reactor, irradiators).
  • A category is fixed during planning, based on the hazard of a facility or activity. A class is declared during an event. People often mix these up.
  • S10 gives no Kenya application for Cat V, so have a line ready (see Q&A).

"Before we plan the response, let's look at the machine we're planning for."

S11From the plant to the emergency Before we plan the response, look at the machine
Say

"Four questions, in order. How does a pressurised water reactor make electricity? Why is the material inside dangerous? How is it held in? And what happens when prevention fails? You don't need to be an engineer. You need just enough to see why the emergency classes are built the way they are."

S12–13How it works From atom to electricity
Say

"Follow the energy through the diagram. Fission splits uranium-235 and the energy becomes heat. Control rods and the moderator keep the chain reaction steady. In the primary loop, water under high pressure carries the heat away, and the pressure stops it boiling. In the steam generator, that water boils separate, clean water through thousands of tubes. The steam spins the turbine, and the generator sends electricity to the grid."

"The point for EPR: in normal operation, the radioactive primary loop and the steam that drives the turbine never mix. Keeping them apart is part of confinement."

Remember
  • The six steps are fission, heat, primary loop, steam generator, turbine and generator.
  • Steam-generator tubes are part of the pressure boundary (barrier ③, S25).

"So where does the radioactivity actually sit?"

S14–16The inventory Where the radioactivity actually sits
Say

"Splitting uranium creates hundreds of unstable atoms, the fission products, and neutrons make surrounding materials radioactive, the activation products. Almost all of it stays inside the fuel."

"The scale: about 5 billion curies in the core of a 3,300 MW(th) light-water reactor, 30 minutes after shutdown. Only the core holds enough material, and enough decay heat to drive it out, to cause injuries or deaths off the site."

"Not all of it moves the same way. Noble gases, krypton and xenon, are the most volatile, and up to 100% could escape in a severe accident with containment failure. Iodine and caesium come next, and iodine concentrates in the thyroid. Strontium, tellurium and the rest matter mainly for ground and the food chain."

"EPR exists because of this inventory, and because the most mobile part of it can travel on the wind."

Remember
  • A nuclide is dangerous because of its volatility, its affinity for the body, high-energy gamma emission and a long half-life.
  • 1 Ci = 3.7×10¹⁰ Bq. Five billion Ci is about 1.85×10²⁰ Bq.
  • Decay heat continues after shutdown, and that is why "remove heat" is a permanent job (S23).

"If that material gets out, how does it actually reach a person?"

S17–18How it reaches people Five ways a release becomes a dose
Say

"Radioactive material only harms people through a pathway, and every protective action later in this module closes one or more of these five."

"Cloudshine is radiation from the plume overhead, and it stops when the plume passes. Groundshine comes from material deposited on surfaces, and it keeps going. Skin dose comes from particles on skin and clothes. Inhalation means breathing the plume, and iodine then goes to the thyroid. Ingestion means contaminated food, milk or water. It is the slowest pathway, so it gives the most time to act."

"No single action closes all five. Sheltering and evacuation cut cloudshine, groundshine and inhalation together. Stable iodine blocks one inhaled nuclide and nothing else. Food restrictions close ingestion. That is why the response always uses several actions at once."

Remember
  • The five pathways are cloudshine, groundshine, skin, inhalation and ingestion.
  • ITB protects only the thyroid, and only against radioiodine.

"And what does that dose do to the body? There are two very different kinds of harm."

S19–20What it does Deterministic vs stochastic effects
Say

"Deterministic effects are the severe, early ones. They have a threshold, and below it the effect does not happen. They appear within hours to weeks: radiation sickness, organ damage, death. Early injuries begin around 0.5–1 Sv whole body. Early deaths are expected around 2.5–6 Sv. About 3 Sv would kill roughly half of those exposed within 60 days with minimal treatment, and supportive care raises that to about 4.5 Sv. The response goal is to prevent these outright."

"Stochastic effects are the long-term risk. There is no threshold, so any dose adds some probability of harm. They appear years later as cancer that looks exactly like any other case. A higher dose changes the odds, not the severity. They cannot be counted in one person. They are a population-level risk, managed by keeping doses low. The response goal is to reduce them as far as reasonably achievable, and that is why the response continues long after the release stops, through relocation, food controls and monitoring."

Remember
  • 1 Sv = 1,000 mSv = 100 rem.
  • LD50/60 is about 3 Sv with minimal care and about 4.5 Sv with supportive care.
  • For comparison, the generic criterion for urgent action is 100 mSv in 7 days, which is 0.1 Sv and far below deterministic thresholds.

"The good news is that getting that material to the public takes several things failing together."

S21–22The condition for harm It only gets out if the barriers fail
Say

"Off-site harm is never the result of one failure. It needs three conditions together: the fuel melts on a substantial scale, AND containment fails or is bypassed, AND there is a path to the atmosphere with a push, usually steam. Only then are off-site injuries or deaths realistic."

"The plant also fights back. Inside an intact containment, gravity and natural settling remove most particles. If containment holds for several hours and the sprays or coolers work, early injuries or deaths are unlikely."

"Keep this in mind for later. Only the highest emergency class orders public protective action, because below it these three conditions are not all present."

Remember
  • Fuel melts AND containment fails AND there is a path and push. All three are required.
  • Three Mile Island is a real example: the core was badly damaged but containment held, and off-site release was minimal.

"So what does a plant have to keep doing to stop the fuel melting in the first place?"

S23–24The three jobs Fundamental safety functions
Say

"Every safety system in a plant serves one of three jobs. The first is to control reactivity: start, steady and stop the chain reaction. Lose it and power runs away. The second is to remove heat, from the reactor and the spent-fuel pool, long after shutdown. Lose it and the fuel overheats even when shut down. The third is to confine radioactive material. Lose it and the inventory starts to move."

"Lose any one of them for long enough and the physical barriers fail in order, from the inside out. That order is exactly what the classification system watches for."

Remember
  • Fukushima is the example for "remove heat": the reactors were shut down, but losing power for cooling led to meltdown.
  • The scenario on S40 (loss of off-site power plus a failed diesel) is a heat-removal story.

"Here are those barriers."

S25–26The barriers Four walls between the fuel and the public
Say

"Four physical walls, from the inside out. ① The fuel matrix, a ceramic UO₂ pellet that locks in most fission products. ② The cladding, the sealed Zircaloy tube, where gases, iodine and caesium collect in the gap. ③ The reactor coolant pressure boundary: vessel, piping, pumps, pressurizer and steam-generator tubes. ④ The containment building, a low-leakage steel and concrete shell that is the final barrier. Its biggest threat is long-term pressurisation, not one sudden blow."

"Each barrier is assessed separately. An accident is graded by how many barriers are challenged or lost, and that is how the emergency class is decided."

"Barriers are things. Defence in depth is the strategy that arranges them."

S27–28The layers Barriers are things, defence in depth is a strategy
Say

"Five successive levels. Level 1 prevents abnormal operation through conservative design and good practice. Level 2 controls abnormal operation and detects failures. Level 3 controls design-basis accidents with engineered safety features. Level 4 controls severe conditions and mitigates severe accidents. Level 5 mitigates the radiological consequences of significant off-site releases, and Level 5 is EPR. That is where every one of you comes in."

Remember
  • Know the difference: 4 physical barriers (things) and 5 levels of defence in depth (strategy).
  • S4 showed the same idea in plain language, with EPR at the bottom.
S29–30The pivot Prevention can fail. That is why response exists.
Say

"Everything before this slide was prevention: design, barriers, safety functions, and the three S's of safety, security and safeguards. Everything after it is response: classify, protect, inform, recover."

"It has happened three times at power plants: Three Mile Island in 1979, Chernobyl in 1986 and Fukushima Daiichi in 2011. Each happened in a country with a mature regulator. Planning for failure is not pessimism. It is the lesson of history."

Remember
  • The three S's are Safety, Security and Safeguards.
  • If challenged on "three times": these are the three major power-reactor accidents with core damage. TMI released little, and that shows the barriers working (S22). Other radiological emergencies, such as Goiânia in Brazil (1987), are Category IV events of the kind Kenya faces today.
  • Know who wrote the quote on S29.

"So when something goes wrong, how does the plant know, and how does it tell everyone?"

S31–32From symptom to declaration How a plant knows, and how it says so
Say

"Operators don't diagnose the accident before they act. There are three steps. Observe: they watch a small number of critical safety functions on control-room instruments, and they don't need to know what happened to know the plant is unsafe. Compare: pre-set Emergency Action Levels turn readings into a class. The judgement was made in advance, in daylight, by people who were not under pressure. Declare: the declaration automatically starts the pre-planned response for that class, meaning notifications, staffing and protective actions."

"Both errors are dangerous. Over-classifying causes needless disruption and fear, and under-classifying loses time. Also, never wait for an INES rating. INES explains an event to the public afterwards. It does not decide what to do now."

Remember
  • The three steps are Observe, Compare (EALs) and Declare.
  • INES is for communication, never for classification.

"Declarations use a shared vocabulary, the five IAEA classes."

S33–34Speaking one language The five IAEA emergency classes
Say

"From the top. General Emergency (Cat I/II): an actual or projected substantial release. All protective actions in the inner zone, and the IAEA and affected States are notified. Site Area Emergency (Cat I/II): major degradation of safety functions, with off-site doses still below criteria. Full on-site activation, and off-site authorities on standby. Facility Emergency (Cat I/II/III): on-site response only, no off-site threat, regulator notified. Alert (Cat I/II/III): protection is uncertain or reduced. Assess, mitigate and raise readiness, with no public action."

"Then Other Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, for Cat IV/V. This is Kenya's daily reality: lost or stolen sources, transport accidents, malicious acts and transboundary events. The response is led from the scene using pre-set safe distances. It is the class most likely to be used in Kenya in the next decade."

"Classification triggers everything downstream, so it must be fast. The draft regulations require 15 minutes for reactor facilities. Defining the criteria is already a statutory duty on KNRA under NRA s.57(a)."

Remember
  • The five classes are GE, SAE, FE, Alert and Other. Only GE orders off-site public protective action.
  • Classification within 15 minutes (draft regulations, reactor facilities).
  • NRA s.57(a) puts the duty on KNRA to set classification criteria. Module 2 calls this the fastest fix.

"Classes tell you how serious an event is. Zones tell you where to act."

S35–36Planning geography Emergency planning zones around an NPP
Say

"Zones are planning tools, not fences. They define which arrangements must exist in advance, and where. PAZ (3–5 km): evacuation, sheltering and stable iodine before or shortly after release, planned and automatic, with sirens and pre-distributed iodine. UPZ (out to 30 km): actions guided by monitoring against OILs. EPD (about 100 km): early actions such as relocation and screening to reduce long-term effects. ICPD (about 300 km): controls on food, milk, water and commodities."

"For counties: Siaya hosts the site, but the UPZ and ICPD reach Kisumu, Busia, Homa Bay, Vihiga and beyond. This is a multi-county plan by nature."

Remember
  • PAZ 3–5 km, UPZ to 30 km, EPD about 100 km, ICPD about 300 km.
  • These are IAEA suggested sizes for large reactors. The actual Siaya zones come from a site-specific hazard assessment.
Check first: the slide shows UPZ as "5–30 km". IAEA guidance for large reactors usually suggests a UPZ radius of 15–30 km. "5–30" reads as "from the PAZ edge out to 30 km". Be ready to explain, or change the slide (see Before you present).

"What do we actually do inside those zones, and what numbers trigger it?"

S37–39Protecting people Protective actions and the numbers that trigger them
Say

"The toolkit has five actions. Shelter in place is often the first and safest. Evacuation is pre-planned in the PAZ and guided by monitoring in the UPZ. Iodine thyroid blocking works best if given early. Food, milk and water restrictions apply out to 300 km. Early relocation is based on measured deposition."

"Two teaching points. First, sheltering is often better than evacuation. Unwarranted mass self-evacuation can cause more harm than the release, so alerting must be geographically targeted. Second, decisions use three pre-set tools. Generic criteria are dose levels where action is justified, for example urgent action at 100 mSv projected in 7 days and ITB at 50 mSv to the thyroid. EALs are plant conditions that trigger classification without debate. OILs are field measurements (µSv/h, Bq) that trigger an action without further calculation. For source events there are safe distances, such as 30 m for a damaged package and 300 m for a suspected dispersal device."

"The whole system is pre-computed. In an emergency nobody should be doing dose arithmetic. Responders compare a reading to a table and act. And this criteria and OIL system is exactly what Module 2 shows Kenya has drafted but never brought into force."

Remember
  • Generic criteria: 100 mSv effective in 7 days for urgent action, 50 mSv thyroid in 7 days for ITB.
  • EALs drive classification. OILs drive protective actions in the field.
Check first: 300 m for a suspected dispersal device. The IAEA first-responder manual commonly gives 400 m for a suspected bomb (exploded or not) and 300 m for a fire or explosion involving a dangerous source. Check this against the source cited on the slide.

"Let's put it all together with one event that escalates."

S40One event, four declarations The scenario
Say

"Here's the scenario. The plant loses off-site power. The emergency diesel generators start, but one fails. Feedwater to a steam generator is then lost, cooling degrades, fuel is damaged, and finally containment is challenged. It is one event that passes through four declarations: Alert, Facility Emergency, Site Area Emergency and General Emergency."

"For each class, watch the same six questions: trigger, actions, who, when, how, where. What to watch for is the circle of people involved growing at each step."

Remember
  • Escalation by who is involved: facility only, then facility and site, then site and vicinity (off-site prepares), then off-site (the public acts).
  • This is a station-blackout-type sequence, like the initiating event at Fukushima.
S41–43① Alert The plant raises its own readiness
Say

"Trigger: off-site power is lost and one diesel fails. The reactor is shut down and stable, but protection is reduced and uncertain, and nothing has been released. Actions: assess, mitigate and raise on-site readiness, with no public action. Who: the control room declares, the on-site emergency organisation staffs up, and KNRA and the national notification point are informed. Off-site responders are told, not activated. When: promptly. In US practice the Technical Support Centre is staffed in about 30 minutes. How: restore equipment, bring up support centres, brief off-site authorities and watch for escalation. Where: the facility only, with nothing in any zone."

Remember
  • "Told, not activated" is the key phrase for off-site agencies at Alert.
S44–46② Facility Emergency The site protects itself
Say

"Trigger: cooling to the steam generator is lost, primary temperature and pressure rise, a leak develops inside the reactor building, and radiation rises inside the plant. Actions: mitigate and protect people at the facility and on site. GSR Part 7 says clearly that this class presents no off-site hazard. Who: the operator's full on-site organisation under the emergency director. The regulator monitors, and off-site agencies are still informed only. How: notify everyone on site, move people to assembly points with monitoring, account for all personnel, give first aid and take urgent on-site actions. Where: facility and site, with no zone activated."

"Note that the US uses four classes (Unusual Event, Alert, SAE, GE) and has no Facility Emergency. That class comes from the IAEA scheme Kenya has adopted."

S47–49③ Site Area Emergency Off-site preparation begins
Say

"Trigger: core cooling can no longer be assured and fuel damage is possible, but there is no significant release yet. Actions: three things at once. Mitigate and protect on site, increase readiness for off-site action, and start off-site monitoring and sampling. Who: the off-site organisations now mobilise. The regulator, county and national responders staff emergency centres, monitoring teams are dispatched, and public information goes out through off-site authorities."

"When: promptly. The value of this class is the time it buys before anything is released. In US practice the off-site emergency operations facility is staffed within about an hour. How: staff all centres, dispatch teams, evacuate non-essential site staff, and put near-site evacuation personnel at their stations. Where: the site and its vicinity. The UPZ goes on standby and warning systems are readied but not necessarily sounded."

Remember
  • SAE is the preparation window, and it is the first class where off-site agencies activate.
  • US practice: early sheltering is possible, but no predetermined public actions are set below GE.
S50–52④ General Emergency The public acts
Say

"Trigger: substantial core degradation is under way and containment is challenged. Both conditions from earlier are now present, and a significant release is happening or projected. Actions: precautionary urgent, urgent and early protective actions, on and off site, plus on-site mitigation."

"Who: the operator declares and recommends, because it sees core and containment conditions first. The off-site decision-maker orders public protective action, county and national responders carry it out, the regulator advises, and the IAEA and potentially affected States are notified. When: before or shortly after release, based on plant conditions, not waiting for measurements. PAZ actions are automatic. In US practice, recommendations reach officials within 15 minutes, the public is alerted within 15 minutes of that, and the regulator is told within one hour."

"Where: PAZ acts on plant conditions alone. UPZ acts on monitoring against OILs. EPD takes early actions. ICPD applies food and commodity controls."

Remember
  • The operator recommends and the off-site decision-maker orders. Module 2 Gap 1 is that Kenya has no legally designated off-site decision-maker. Expect a question on this.
  • US timings: 15 min, then 15 min, then 1 hour.
S53–55The public's experience What people are asked to do, and how well it works
Say

"Evacuation is the single most effective action if done before or shortly after release. It avoids plume, ground and inhalation dose at once and clears the highest-risk area. Sheltering is useful but limited. A typical house cuts dose by about a factor of 2, a closed small dwelling by about 3 for a one-hour release, and large concrete buildings do far better. Iodine thyroid blocking only works if taken just before, or within 1–2 hours of, intake, and it supplements evacuation or sheltering but never replaces them."

"Food, milk and water restrictions usually allow hours to days, which is why they are planned nationally. Contamination control covers monitoring and decontaminating evacuees and controlling access. Early relocation finds hot spots after the plume passes; US practice uses a trip level of about 1 R/h. Improvised respiratory protection, such as a towel over the face, is secondary only. It helps against particles, not gases, and must never delay sheltering or evacuation."

Remember
  • Sheltering reduces dose by a factor of about 2 (typical house) to 3 (closed small dwelling, one-hour release).
  • ITB must be taken just before, or within 1–2 hours of, intake.

"Now the people we send in."

S56–57Protecting the protectors Emergency worker and helper dose regime
Say

"Emergency workers have their own guidance values, in Hp(10). Routine emergency response such as firefighting and monitoring: under 50 mSv, with full PPE, dosimetry and medical fitness. Averting a large collective dose: under 100 mSv, informed volunteers only, where the benefit clearly justifies it. Lifesaving and preventing severe effects: under 500 mSv, volunteers only, with informed consent, a full briefing, and no pregnant or breastfeeding workers. Helpers, meaning members of the public who volunteer: up to 50 mSv, registered, briefed and with dose recorded."

"The principle is that nobody is ordered into a high dose. Also: dosimeters for every worker, doses recorded, ITB where radioiodine is possible, medical advice above 200 mSv before any further exposure, and just-in-time briefing for workers not designated in advance."

"EPREV Recommendation 11 on responder dose control stays open until dosimeters actually reach first responders. Module 3 returns to it."

Remember
  • 50 / 100 / 500 mSv for workers, ≤50 mSv for helpers, and medical advice above 200 mSv.
  • Hp(10) is the personal dose equivalent at 10 mm depth, which is what a dosimeter reads.
S58–59The cast Who does what
Say

"Every institution in this room is on this slide. Government and Cabinet: policy, declaring a National State of Disaster, international assistance and treaties. KNRA: sets requirements, approves every operator plan (a licence precondition), sets classification criteria, gives technical advice, and is the IAEA contact point. The operator: classifies and declares, mitigates on site, and notifies the regulator, operations centre and county within 15 minutes. NDRMA and the national operations centre: all-hazards command and multi-agency coordination. Counties: carry out protective actions on the ground (evacuation, shelters, reception centres, local communication). Sector agencies: MoH and KNH, Police and KDF, fire and HAZMAT, NEMA, the Communications Authority, the Red Cross and St John."

"The architecture is standard worldwide. The operator acts on site, the regulator judges and advises, the all-hazards system commands off site, and counties carry it out. No one institution can respond alone, which is why GSR Part 7 Requirement 2 requires a national coordinating mechanism at the preparedness stage. Module 2 shows where Kenya's version has gaps."

Check first: the operator is listed as "KenGen / licensees", and the centre as "NEOC" while Module 2 uses "NDOC". Confirm the owner and operator designation and use one name for the operations centre across both decks.

"Close Module 1: we know what good looks like. Module 2 asks where Kenya stands against it."

Module 2: Where Kenya Stands

The legal and institutional review (review date 30 August 2026). It follows three questions: what we looked at, what we currently have, and how we improve it. The tone should be evidence, not blame. Findings are textual, and legal interpretation is for the Attorney-General.

S1Title Where Kenya Stands
Say

"Module 2 in one sentence: Kenya has strong laws and a complete technical draft. But the technical layer is not in force, and the on-site and off-site sides are not connected. Most of this can be fixed with regulations under two Acts that already exist."

"Say the review date aloud: 30 August 2026. Everything is as of that date."

S2Module at a glance Three questions, one storyline
Say

"Part 1 is the method, Part 2 the diagnosis, Part 3 the prescription. The big message: Kenya already knows what good EPR looks like. The task is to bring it into force and connect the on-site and off-site sides."

S3Three benchmarks GSR Part 7 · EPREV 2015 · US/UK/EU
Say

"A is the standard itself, GSR Part 7, with 26 requirements. B is the independent peer review Kenya requested in 2015: 14 recommendations, 5 suggestions and 5 good practices. We checked what has been resolved eleven years on. C is the US, UK and EU. They are not used to grade Kenya. They show at what level of law other States place the same duties, and that tells us the fastest lawful fix."

"One rule throughout: a draft shows intent. It never counts as compliance. Every finding was re-checked against the primary text of the instrument cited."

S4Six tiers of legal force The lens for the whole module
Say

"T0 is the Constitution and treaties. T1 is Acts, which create bodies, powers, offences and funds. T2 is Regulations, made under a power in an Act. T3 is regulatory instruments, the regulator's guides and licence conditions. T4 is national plans, which are law only if an Act says so. T5 is administrative arrangements such as MoUs, SOPs and ToRs, which are not law."

"As you go down, legal force falls but speed rises. Under Constitution Art. 94(5), nothing below an Act has force unless the Constitution or legislation gives it. So for every gap, the question is: what is the lowest, fastest tier that still binds the body that has to act?"

S5Kenya's framework today, tier by tier
Say

"This is the one-picture answer. T0 shared: disaster management is shared between national and county government, and treaty status is unverified. T1 in force: the Nuclear Regulatory Act 2019 and the NDRM Act 2026, but neither mentions the other. T2 empty: the 2021 EPR Regulations were never signed, and nothing has been made under the NDRM Act. T3 empty: no KNRA guides or EPR licence conditions were found. T4 mixed: NERP 2020 is in force but silent on radiation, the CBRN Response Plan 2015 is still a draft, and the CBRN Action Plan 2025 is non-binding. T5 not law: the Working Group ToR is unsigned, plus the 2013 Presidential Directive and Executive Order No. 2 of 2023 (unverified)."

"The diagnosis is in the two red rows. Regulations and regulatory instruments carry the technical detail in every comparator State, and both are empty in Kenya. And because T0 makes disaster management a shared function, national rules alone cannot command county fire services or hospitals."

S6What is already working
Say

"Be generous here. NRA 2019, in force since January 2020: no licence without an approved emergency plan (s.58), on-site and off-site plans required and reviewed (ss.59–60), immediate IAEA notification with KNRA as contact point (s.61), and a national source register (s.39). Section 58 is broader than the US equivalent because it gates any authorization of any activity, facility or source, not only power reactors."

"NDRM Act 2026, in force since June 2026: a statutory disaster authority, legal classification and declaration of disasters (ss.29–30), a national responder database (s.27), annual drills (s.7(p)), and a power to protect responders that has never been used (s.55(2)(i))."

"Groundwork: the draft 2021 Regulations cover all 26 requirements, the National Incident Command System is in use, SMS tower alerting has been demonstrated, and radiation detection is in border, police and customs training. The 2015 good practices were verified in 2015, so present them as foundations to reconfirm, not current findings."

S7The scorecard Built on paper, not yet in force
Say

"Two headline numbers. Against GSR Part 7: 0 conformant, 15 partially conformant, 10 not conformant, and 1 not applicable. Requirement 3 is addressed to international organizations. 0 of 26 fully or largely met."

"Against EPREV 2015: 2 of 14 recommendations resolved (R5 and R6, both through the NRA 2019), 2 partly resolved, 10 unresolved, and 0 of 5 suggestions."

"The pattern: where a requirement is covered at all, it is by a law in force that ignores radiation, or by a radiation text that is not in force."

Remember
  • 15 + 10 + 1 = 26, and 2 + 2 + 10 = 14.
  • Expect "the draft covers all 26 requirements, so why zero?" See the Q&A.
S8Five structural gaps
Say

"These five gaps explain almost every score. 1. Nobody owns the off-site response. Operators have a rigorous on-site regime that hands off to nobody: no off-site strategy, no designated decision-maker and no prescribed off-site plan. This is the core gap. 2. Radiation is invisible in the national system. We verified zero references in NERP 2020 (166 pages) and the NDRM Act 2026, and KNRA and Health are not on the NDRMA Board. Until classified, every disaster is deemed a county disaster under s.29(6), which is the wrong default for a radiological release."

"3. No single answer on the day. Five documents give different answers to who declares, coordinates, commands on scene and orders protective actions. 4. The public is not medically covered. The draft rules cover operators' workers only, with no triage or casualty pathway for the public. 5. Alerting and funding are not in law. SMS alerting was never codified, and the Disaster Risk Management Fund has not been set up."

S9The 2021 EPR Regulations Necessary, but not enough
Say

"This is the turning point of the module. Necessary: the draft holds every technical rule Kenya lacks, including categories, intervention levels, worker dose limits and plan outlines. It is a competent, one-to-one transposition of GSR Part 7, and it has been unsigned for about five years."

"Not enough: it was made under the NRA, so it can bind only KNRA and licensees, not NDOC, NDRMA, Health or counties. In the text, 'the operator' appears 172 times, and national bodies appear zero times."

"Settle first: s.98(1) gives the power to make regulations to the Authority, in consultation with the Cabinet Secretary, but the draft is expressed as made by the Cabinet Secretary. Say this clearly: it is a textual discrepancy, not a legal opinion. It is for the Attorney-General."

"The conclusion: the off-site duty-holder cannot come from these Regulations. It has to be created under the NDRM Act."

S10If an emergency happened today…
Say

Read slowly. This is Part 2 in six lines.

"✓ A licensed operator with a KNRA-approved on-site plan, a real advance since 2015. ✗ A national system that never mentions radiation. ✗ Technical criteria unsigned since 2021. ✗ No one legally in charge of off-site protective actions. ✗ Hospitals with no radiological triage in law or in draft. ✗ An emergency fund that doesn't yet exist."

"One tick and five crosses. The good news is that most of the crosses can be removed without going back to Parliament."

S11The key: regulation powers in two Acts
Say

"The two Acts reach two different sets of bodies. NRA s.98 reaches KNRA and licensed operators, covering emergency categories and criteria, worker dose limits, classification and 24/7 notification, and the form of on-site and off-site plans (s.59). NDRM Act s.55 reaches the disaster-management system, and the counties through consultation with the Council of Governors, covering off-site decision authority, the mandatory s.29(8) classification criteria, public warning and responder protection (s.55(2)(i))."

"Together they give a connected on-site and off-site framework without amending either Act, and neither Act is enough on its own. The UK did exactly this. Its 2019 REPPIR regulations were made under a 1974 Act and put a named off-site duty on a named local authority, and nobody amended the Act."

S12A simple test Do we really need to amend an Act?
Say

"Teach this. The Working Group will use it repeatedly. Step 1: is there a power in an Act to make rules on this? If not, amend the Act. Step 2: does it create a body, offence or fund, or change county roles? If yes, it needs Parliament or county law. Step 3: does the duty fall on a body governed by a different Act? If yes, use that Act's power, or an MoU or joint SOP. Step 4: otherwise, use the lowest tier that binds: regulations, then licence conditions, then plans and MoUs."

"Step 3 is the one people get wrong, and it is what went wrong in 2021. A good instrument was drafted to carry duties it had no power to impose on the bodies that needed to bear them. Applied to Kenya's gaps, the answer is almost always Step 4, regulations under the right Act."

S13How each critical gap can be closed
Say

Don't read every row. Point at the Time column.

"Row 4 is the fastest item on the whole roadmap. NRA s.57(a) already obliges KNRA to define emergency classification criteria. That has been in force since 10 January 2020 and does not depend on the draft Regulations being signed. Row 6: Parliament has already given the power to make responder-protection regulations, in NDRM s.55(2)(i). Row 7 is where we must be honest. County health is devolved, so national rules reach only part of it."

"7 of 8 gaps are regulation-level work. Gap 4 only needs KNRA to act on a duty that already exists."

Remember
  • Timing: gap 2 takes weeks to months (sign ToR or MoU first), gap 4 is immediate, gap 7 is partial, and the rest take months.
S14Only five things truly need Parliament
Say

"We looked for a workaround for each of these, and none exists at the regulation tier. P1: add KNRA and Health to the NDRMA Board, since membership is fixed in s.9. This is the one to press. The Board that classifies a radiological disaster has, by statute, neither the health ministry nor the nuclear regulator at the table. P2: create offences for off-site EPR failures, because neither Act gives that power."

"P3: make the fund mandatory. Section 45 only says it 'may' be established, but today the Treasury can set it up under s.45 with PFM Act s.24(4). P4: place duties directly on counties, since fire, disaster and health are devolved. For now, use county laws or an intergovernmental agreement. P5: name the national body in NRA s.57. For now, get the same effect by designating it in NDRM s.55 regulations."

"P3 and P5 are good news because each has a lawful route today. Naming these five stops the Working Group wasting a year trying them at the wrong tier."

S15The roadmap What, when, who
Say

"Immediate (0–3 months): KNRA asks the AG who makes the EPR Regulations. KNRA issues classification criteria under s.57(a). All members sign the Working Group ToR. The Treasury establishes the Disaster Risk Management Fund. Within 12 months: KNRA and the CS finalise and gazette the EPR Regulations. The CS and the Council of Governors make off-site regulations under s.55. The CS makes the mandatory s.29(8) classification regulations. Before commissioning: Foreign Affairs and KNRA confirm treaty status, and Health and the Council of Governors set medical and county arrangements through an intergovernmental agreement."

"Be honest about timing. Regulations are faster than an amendment, but not fast. They need consultation, possibly a regulatory impact statement, gazettement, laying before Parliament within 7 sitting days, and up to 28 sitting days of committee scrutiny. Gazettement is not the finish line: under Statutory Instruments Act s.11(4), an instrument that is published but not laid ceases to have effect."

S16The bottom line Three things to take away
Say

"What we have: strong Acts and a complete technical draft, but the technical layer is not in force and the national system ignores radiation. What is missing: the off-site side, meaning someone legally in charge of off-site decisions, warnings, responder protection and public medical care. How we fix it: regulations under two existing Acts, NRA s.98 for operators and NDRM s.55 for the response system. Only five items need Parliament."

"Earlier editions said signing the Legal Notice was the single most consequential act available. The evidence says signature is necessary, not sufficient. It cannot reach off-site bodies, and it may not be the Cabinet Secretary's to give. Module 3 is next."

Note: the speaker notes say "then read the quote", but no quote text was found on this slide. Add the quote, or drop that cue.

Anticipated questions & responses

Questions are collapsed so you can test yourself first. Tags: likely will almost certainly come up. tough is a challenge or a political question. beyond deck means the answer draws on general knowledge not on the slides, so verify it before relying on it.

Module 1: concepts and technical

We don't have a nuclear plant yet. Why spend on EPR now?likely

Three reasons. (1) The hazard exists today. Category IV applies to every State, and Kenya has more than 1,500 registered sources, transport routes, border detections and orphan-source risk. EPREV reviewed Kenya as a Cat III/IV State. (2) GSR Part 7 requires arrangements to be in place and exercised before a facility operates. (3) Lead time. Siaya construction starts in 2028 and commissioning is in 2034. Regulations take months, and zones, alerting, iodine distribution, county plans and exercises take years. Starting now is on schedule, not early.

Deck 1 S3, S8–10, S4 notes

If nuclear power is safe, why does it need all this emergency planning?tough

Planning for failure is how safe industries stay safe, just as aviation has evacuation slides. Defence in depth assumes each barrier can fail. EPR is Level 5, the guarantee that the public is protected even if everything else fails. It is not a prediction. Off-site harm needs three failures together (fuel melt, containment failure, and a path and push), and that is why the lower emergency classes ask nothing of the public.

Deck 1 S4–5, S21–22, S27–28

What's the difference between an emergency preparedness category and an emergency class?likely

A category (I–V) is set during planning from the hazard a facility or activity could pose, and it decides how much preparedness is needed. A class (General, Site Area, Facility, Alert, Other) is declared during an event and triggers the pre-planned response. For example, a Cat I plant can declare any of the four facility classes as an event develops.

Deck 1 S8–10, S33–34

Could a Chernobyl or Fukushima happen in Kenya?toughbeyond deck

Nobody can responsibly say "never", and that is the whole point of EPR (S29). But context matters. Chernobyl was an RBMK design with no full containment building and unstable reactor physics. Modern pressurised water reactors have a containment and different physics. Fukushima was a loss of heat removal after a tsunami knocked out power. The lesson worldwide was to protect against station blackout and to strengthen off-site planning. Siting for Kenya includes hazard studies (seismic, flooding and others). Our scenario in S40 deliberately starts with loss of power, so the lessons are built in.

Deck 1 S23–24, S29–30, S40; design details are general knowledge

The slide says it has happened "three times". What about others? Three Mile Island hardly released anything.

Correct, and that helps the argument. The three are the major power-reactor accidents with core damage. At TMI the core was badly damaged but containment largely held, which is exactly the "plant fights back" point on S22. There have been other serious radiological emergencies. Goiânia (Brazil, 1987), an abandoned teletherapy source, is the classic Category IV example and the kind of event Kenya faces today.

Deck 1 S22, S30; Goiânia is general knowledge

beyond deck
Why shelter people instead of evacuating straight away?likely

Evacuation is the single most effective action if it happens before or shortly after a release. Moving people through a passing plume can be worse than staying indoors, and mass or unwarranted evacuation causes real harm, especially to the sick and elderly. That was seen at Fukushima. Sheltering is fast, but it is limited: a factor of about 2 for a typical house and about 3 for a closed small dwelling. So it is often the first action, followed by evacuation or relocation guided by monitoring. Alerting must be geographically targeted so people outside the affected area don't self-evacuate.

Deck 1 S6 notes, S37 notes, S53

Should people keep iodine tablets at home? Is iodised salt enough?likely

Stable iodine protects only the thyroid and only against radioiodine. It must be taken just before, or within 1–2 hours of, intake. It is a supplement, never a substitute for sheltering or evacuation. In the PAZ it is pre-distributed as part of the plan, and further out it is distributed on instruction, following WHO dosing. Iodised salt is not a substitute. It contains far too little iodine to block the thyroid, and eating large amounts is harmful. People should not self-medicate. They should follow official instructions.

Deck 1 S18, S37, S53; the salt point is general knowledge

beyond deck
Who actually decides to evacuate the public?likelytough

In the standard architecture (Deck 1 S51), the operator declares General Emergency and recommends, the off-site decision-maker orders, counties and national responders carry it out, and the regulator advises.

In Kenya today (Deck 2 Gap 1), no law designates that off-site decision-maker. Draft Reg. 14(19) assumes a body no law creates, and five documents give different answers. The route is a signed Working Group ToR or MoU now, then designation through NDRM Act s.55 regulations within 12 months.

Deck 1 S51; Deck 2 S8, S10, S13 row 2

Why do we have to wait for measurements before acting in a General Emergency?

We don't. At General Emergency, actions in the PAZ are pre-planned and automatic, based on plant conditions, before or shortly after any release. Monitoring against OILs guides action further out in the UPZ. Waiting for measurements near the plant would waste the only window that prevents dose.

Deck 1 S51–52

Why not wait for the INES rating before declaring?

INES is a communication scale used to explain an event's significance to the public, usually afterwards. Classification uses pre-set EALs and must be done within minutes (15 for reactor facilities in the draft regulations). Rating must never delay classification or response.

Deck 1 S32, S33 notes

What are EALs, OILs and generic criteria? Aren't they the same thing?

They are three different layers. Generic criteria are dose levels where action is justified, such as 100 mSv in 7 days for urgent action and 50 mSv to the thyroid for ITB. EALs are observable plant conditions that trigger an emergency class. OILs are field measurements (µSv/h, Bq) derived from the generic criteria that trigger a protective action without anyone calculating dose. The aim is that responders compare a reading to a table and act.

Deck 1 S38–39

What dose is actually dangerous? How does it compare with normal life?

Severe early (deterministic) effects start around 0.5–1 Sv whole body. About 3 Sv is lethal to half of those exposed with minimal care, and about 4.5 Sv with supportive care. The protective-action trigger of 100 mSv in 7 days is well below those thresholds, deliberately, to keep long-term cancer risk low. For scale, average natural background worldwide is a few mSv per year (around 2.4 mSv per UNSCEAR).

Deck 1 S19–20, S38; background figure is general knowledge

beyond deck
Will people near an accident get cancer?

Stochastic risk has no threshold, and a higher dose raises the probability, not the severity. A radiation-induced cancer is indistinguishable from any other and can't be attributed in a single person. It is a population-level risk. That is why the response keeps doses as low as reasonably achievable through relocation, food controls and monitoring, and why honest communication about risk is part of the response (goal 6: prevent fear and stigma).

Deck 1 S6, S20

How big will the zones around Siaya be? Which counties are affected?likely

The IAEA suggested sizes for large reactors are PAZ 3–5 km, UPZ to about 30 km, EPD about 100 km and ICPD about 300 km. Final sizes come from a site-specific hazard assessment. Siaya hosts the site, but the UPZ and ICPD reach Kisumu, Busia, Homa Bay, Vihiga and beyond, so it is a multi-county plan. Zones are planning areas, not fences or exclusion zones.

Deck 1 S35–36 notes

Can a firefighter or police officer be ordered into a high-radiation area?likely

No. Routine emergency tasks stay under 50 mSv. Averting a large collective dose (under 100 mSv) and lifesaving (under 500 mSv) are for informed volunteers only, excluding pregnant or breastfeeding workers. Every worker gets dosimetry and dose recording, and above 200 mSv needs medical advice before any further exposure. In Kenya today this regime exists only in the draft. The NDRM s.55(2)(i) power to make it binding has not been used, and EPREV R11 stays open until dosimeters reach first responders.

Deck 1 S56–57; Deck 2 S6, S13 row 6

What would we do today if a radioactive source were stolen or found in scrap metal?

That is the "Other nuclear or radiological emergency" class for Cat IV. It is led from the scene with pre-set safe distances (inner cordon of 30 m for a damaged package, larger for a suspected device), no one touches or moves the item, KNRA is notified and supports source recovery, and the national source register (NRA s.39) helps identify the source. Border detection training and radiation in police and customs curricula are the capabilities already in place.

Deck 1 S34, S39; Deck 2 S6

Does Category V matter to Kenya? We have no neighbour with a reactor.

Not today, but Cat V is about future readiness. It covers areas near a foreign Cat I or II facility, where the concern is contamination of food and commodities, and trade and imports matter as much as geography. As regional nuclear programmes progress, for example Uganda's stated plans, Kenya would need arrangements for transboundary notification and food and commodity monitoring. Transboundary events are already on the hazard list (S3).

Deck 1 S3, S10; Uganda's plans are general knowledge, so verify the current status

beyond deck
Why does the IAEA have a "Facility Emergency" class when the US doesn't?

The US uses four classes: Notification of Unusual Event, Alert, Site Area Emergency and General Emergency. The IAEA scheme, which Kenya has adopted, includes Facility Emergency for events that need protective action on the site but present no off-site hazard, and it also applies to Cat III facilities. It makes clear to off-site agencies that they stay informed, not activated.

Deck 1 S46

Why are food controls planned out to 300 km and at national level?

Ingestion is the slowest pathway, so there are usually hours to days to act. But contaminated food, milk and water can travel far through markets. It needs national standards, laboratory capacity, and coordination across agriculture, health, trade and customs, and no single county can do that.

Deck 1 S18, S54

Module 2: legal, institutional and policy

The draft Regulations cover all 26 GSR Part 7 requirements, so how can the score be zero?likely

Two reasons. (1) A draft never counts as compliance. GSR Part 7 requires arrangements to be in place, and the Regulations have been unsigned since 2021. (2) Even if signed, being made under the NRA they bind only KNRA and licensees ("the operator" 172 times, national bodies 0 times), so the off-site half of most requirements would still be uncovered. Credit is given where it is due: 15 requirements are partially conformant.

Deck 2 S3, S7, S9

Are you saying the draft Regulations are unlawful?tough

No. This is a textual discrepancy, not a legal opinion. NRA s.98(1) gives the power to make regulations to the Authority, in consultation with the Cabinet Secretary, while the draft is expressed as made by the Cabinet Secretary. Which reading is correct is for the Attorney-General. That is why "ask the AG" is the first item on the roadmap: better to settle it before signature than to face a challenge afterwards.

Deck 2 S9, S15

Why have the Regulations sat unsigned for five years? Who is responsible?tough

Keep to the evidence and don't assign blame. "The review looked at the texts, not at the reasons for delay. What the texts show is an open question about who holds the power to make them, and that the draft by itself could not have delivered the off-site side even if signed. So the forward-looking fix is to clarify authority with the AG, sign, and pair it with NDRM Act regulations."

Deck 2 S9, S16

Wouldn't it be simpler to amend the Nuclear Regulatory Act to cover everything?likely

It would be slower and is not necessary. Apply the four-step test. The powers already exist: NRA s.98 reaches operators and NDRM Act s.55 reaches the disaster system and counties (through consultation with the Council of Governors). Stretching the NRA to command NDOC, Health or counties repeats the 2021 mistake (Step 3). The UK precedent is REPPIR 2019, made under a 1974 Act, which names an off-site duty-holder with no Act amendment. Only five items truly need Parliament.

Deck 2 S11, S12, S14

The NDRM Act is all-hazards. Doesn't that already cover radiation?likely

In principle yes, in practice not yet. It never mentions radiation. KNRA and Health are not on the Board that classifies disasters (s.9). No s.29(8) classification criteria have been made, although they are mandatory. The default under s.29(6) is that an unclassified disaster is a county disaster, which is the wrong starting point for a radiological release that crosses county lines. All-hazards architecture is the right platform. It just needs radiation-specific regulations under s.55.

Deck 2 S5, S8, S11, S14

Can't KNRA and the Ministry of Health simply be invited to NDRMA Board meetings?tough

They can be consulted or invited administratively, and that is worth doing now. But an invitation is not a statutory seat or a vote. Board membership is fixed in NDRM Act s.9, and the review found no workaround at regulation tier, so a proper seat is item P1 for Parliament. It's the one to press, because the body that classifies a radiological disaster should have the regulator and Health at the table by law.

Deck 2 S14; the administrative invitation point is a practical suggestion

beyond deck
Counties are devolved. How can national regulations make them act?likely

Partly they can't, and the deck says so. Disaster management is a shared function (Constitution Sch. 4), and fire, disaster and health services are devolved. NDRM s.55 regulations are made in consultation with the Council of Governors and can shape the national system. Placing duties directly on county governments needs Parliament (P4). For now the route is county laws or an intergovernmental agreement, and that is how the roadmap handles medical and county arrangements.

Deck 2 S5, S13 row 7, S14 P4, S15

What can we realistically do in the next three months?likely

Four things, none needing Parliament. (1) KNRA issues emergency classification criteria. The duty has existed under NRA s.57(a) since 10 January 2020, and it does not wait for the draft Regulations. (2) KNRA seeks the AG's view on who makes the EPR Regulations. (3) All members sign the Working Group ToR, giving interim off-site coordination. (4) The Treasury establishes the Disaster Risk Management Fund (NDRM s.45 + PFM Act s.24(4)).

Deck 2 S13, S15

How long will the regulations take? "Months" sounds vague.

The steps are consultation, possibly a regulatory impact statement, gazettement, then laying before Parliament within 7 sitting days and up to 28 sitting days of committee scrutiny. Sitting days are not calendar days, so recess lengthens this. The roadmap target is within 12 months. A warning: under Statutory Instruments Act s.11(4), an instrument that is gazetted but not laid ceases to have effect.

Deck 2 S15 and notes

Is Kenya a party to the Early Notification and Assistance Conventions?tough

Reconcile the two decks before you present. Deck 1 S7 says "not party, accession in progress", while Deck 2 lists treaty status as unverified and puts "confirm treaty status" on the roadmap before commissioning (Foreign Affairs with KNRA). A safe answer: "Whatever the treaty position, the notification duty is already in domestic law. NRA s.61 requires immediate notification of the IAEA with KNRA as contact point. Confirming treaty status is a roadmap action before reactor commissioning."

Deck 1 S7; Deck 2 S5, S6, S15

Are IAEA safety standards legally binding on Kenya?beyond deck

Not directly. IAEA Safety Standards are not binding on Member States in themselves. They are binding on the IAEA's own operations and on States in IAEA-assisted projects. They become binding in Kenya when written into national law, and that is exactly what the NRA, the NDRM Act and the draft Regulations do or would do. This is why the review uses the rule that only instruments in force count.

General knowledge; links to Deck 2 S3–4

Why compare Kenya with the US, UK and EU? Our context is different.

Agreed, which is why comparators are not used to grade Kenya. They answer one practical question: at what level of law do other States place the same duties? The answer is almost always regulations and regulatory instruments, not Acts. That shows the fastest lawful route for Kenya. The grading is against GSR Part 7 and EPREV only.

Deck 2 S3

Which EPREV recommendations were resolved, and how?

R5 and R6 were resolved, both by the Nuclear Regulatory Act 2019. Two more are partly resolved and 10 unresolved, and none of the 5 suggestions is resolved. R11 on responder dose control is a named open item that Module 3 picks up. The 5 good practices were verified in 2015 and should be reconfirmed, not presented as current.

Deck 2 S6 notes, S7; Deck 1 S56 notes

What is missing on the medical side?

The draft rules (Reg. 19) cover the operator's workers only. There is no radiological triage or casualty pathway for the public in law or in draft, and the Emergency Medical Care Policy doesn't fill that gap. Health is largely devolved, so the fix combines national regulations with Health and county instruments, done through an intergovernmental agreement led by Health with the Council of Governors. It's rated "partial" because national rules only reach part of it.

Deck 2 S8 gap 4, S10, S13 row 7, S15

We already demonstrated SMS alerting. Why is public warning still a gap?

A demonstration is capability, not an arrangement. It isn't codified: nobody is legally required to trigger it, and there are no criteria for when, where or with what message. The fix is NDRM s.55 regulations for public warning plus an MoU with the Communications Authority. Module 1 explains why it matters: alerting must be geographically targeted to avoid mass self-evacuation.

Deck 2 S6, S8 gap 5, S13 row 5; Deck 1 S37 notes

Given all these gaps, should Kenya slow down its nuclear power programme?tough

Stay within the module's remit: "This review didn't assess the programme. It assessed EPR law and institutions. What it shows is that the gaps are largely institutional and legal, and most can be closed with regulations under Acts we already have, with a concrete roadmap, well ahead of commissioning in 2034. The more urgent point is that Category III and IV hazards exist today, whatever happens to the programme."

Deck 2 S10–S16; Deck 1 S8

NuPEA promotes nuclear power. Isn't it a conflict for NuPEA to review EPR?toughbeyond deck

"NuPEA coordinated this review as part of the NEPIO function, and the findings are critical of the current state, which shows it isn't a promotional exercise. Every finding is traceable to the primary text of an instrument, and none of it changes KNRA's independent regulatory role. The actions fall mainly on KNRA, the Cabinet Secretary, the Treasury, Health and the Council of Governors."

Deck 2 S1 footer, S3 notes; framing is a suggested response

What is Executive Order No. 2 of 2023 and why is it "unverified"?

It appears in the administrative tier (T5) as reportedly relevant to institutional roles, but the review could not confirm its text or effect against a primary source, so it is flagged and not relied on. This follows the method of checking every finding against the primary text. If someone in the room has the instrument, invite them to share it with the Working Group.

Deck 2 S5; handling is a suggested response

Handling technique

  • Don't know? Say "That's a good question. I don't want to give you a wrong number, so I'll confirm and come back to you." Write it down visibly.
  • Out of scope (waste, nuclear security detail, programme cost, siting politics): say "That's covered under [Module 3/4 or the relevant agency]. Let's take it at the break."
  • Legal interpretation requested: "The review reports what the texts say. Interpretation is for the Attorney-General."
  • Blame questions: move to the forward-looking fix and the named owner on the roadmap (S15).
  • Bridge back to the one-sentence message of the module after each tough answer.

Cheat sheet: numbers & sections to know cold

Module 1

FigureWhat it is
26Requirements in IAEA GSR Part 7 (2015)
13International organisations co-sponsoring GSR Part 7
8Goals of emergency response
5 / 5Emergency preparedness categories (I–V) / emergency classes (GE, SAE, FE, Alert, Other)
>1,500Registered radiation sources in Kenya
2028 / 2034Siaya NPP construction start / commissioning; research reactor about 2030
3 · 4 · 5Fundamental safety functions · physical barriers · levels of defence in depth
5Exposure pathways: cloudshine, groundshine, skin, inhalation, ingestion
≈5 billion CiCore inventory, 3,300 MW(th) LWR, 30 min after shutdown
0.5–1 SvEarly deterministic injuries begin
2.5–6 SvEarly deaths expected
~3 / ~4.5 SvLD50/60 with minimal / supportive medical care
15 minClassification time for reactor facilities (draft regs); operator notification time (S58)
3–5 · 30 · 100 · 300 kmPAZ · UPZ · EPD · ICPD
100 mSv / 7 dGeneric criterion for urgent protective action (effective dose)
50 mSv thyroidGeneric criterion for iodine thyroid blocking
1–2 hITB effective window around intake
×2 / ×3Dose reduction from sheltering: typical house / closed small dwelling (1-h release)
30 m / 300 mSafe distance: damaged package / suspected dispersal device (verify, see checks)
50 · 100 · 500 mSvEmergency worker guidance: routine · avert collective dose · lifesaving (Hp(10))
≤50 mSv · 200 mSvHelpers limit · medical advice threshold before further exposure
US: 30 min · 1 hTechnical Support Centre staffed · off-site EOF staffed
US: 15 · 15 · 60 minPARs to officials · public alerted · regulator notified
~1 R/hUS early relocation trip level
1979 · 1986 · 2011TMI · Chernobyl · Fukushima Daiichi

Module 2

Figure / sectionWhat it is
30 Aug 2026Review date
0 · 15 · 10 · 1GSR Part 7: conformant · partial · not conformant · N/A (Req. 3)
2 · 2 · 10 of 14EPREV 2015 recommendations: resolved (R5, R6) · partly · unresolved
0 of 5 · 5EPREV suggestions resolved · good practices (verified in 2015)
6 tiersT0 Constitution/treaties, T1 Acts, T2 Regulations, T3 Regulatory instruments, T4 Plans, T5 Administrative
5 · 8 · 5Structural gaps · critical gaps in closure table · items needing Parliament
172 vs 0Mentions of "the operator" vs national bodies in draft EPR Regs
166 pagesNERP 2020, with zero radiation references
10 Jan 2020NRA 2019 in force (s.57(a) duty live since then)
June 2026NDRM Act 2026 in force
7 · 28 sitting daysLaying before Parliament · max committee scrutiny (Statutory Instruments Act; s.11(4) unlaid ceases to have effect)
ProvisionEffect
NRA s.39National register of radiation sources
NRA s.57 / 57(a)KNRA emergency functions / define emergency classification criteria (P5: name the national body)
NRA s.58No authorization without approved emergency plan (any activity, facility, source)
NRA ss.59–60On-site and off-site plans required and reviewed; s.59(1) plan form
NRA s.61Immediate IAEA notification; KNRA contact point
NRA s.98 / 98(1)Regulation-making power, held by the Authority in consultation with the CS (vs draft "made by CS")
NDRM s.7(p)Annual drills
NDRM s.9NDRMA Board membership, fixed (P1)
NDRM s.27National responder database
NDRM ss.29–30Classification and declaration of disasters
NDRM s.29(6)Unclassified disaster is deemed a county disaster
NDRM s.29(8)Mandatory classification criteria regulations
NDRM s.45Disaster Risk Management Fund, "may" be established (P3)
NDRM s.55Regulation-making power (with Council of Governors consultation); (2)(a),(e) coordination; (2)(f) warning; (2)(i) responder protection
PFM Act s.24(4)With NDRM s.45, lets the Treasury set up the Fund now
Const. Art. 94(5)No force of law except under authority of Constitution or legislation
Const. Sch. 4Distribution of functions; disaster management shared, health largely devolved
Draft Reg. 14(19)Assumes an off-site body no law creates
Draft Reg. 19Medical provisions, operators' workers only
UK REPPIR 2019Precedent: off-site duty placed by regulations under a 1974 Act, no amendment

Acronyms

EPR Emergency Preparedness & ResponseGSR General Safety RequirementsEPREV Emergency Preparedness Review (IAEA)
INIR Integrated Nuclear Infrastructure ReviewUSIE Unified System for Information Exchange in Incidents & EmergenciesRANET Response and Assistance Network
IEC IAEA Incident and Emergency CentreEAL Emergency Action LevelOIL Operational Intervention Level
PAZ / UPZ Precautionary / Urgent Protective Action (Planning) ZoneEPD / ICPD Extended Planning Distance / Ingestion & Commodities Planning DistanceITB Iodine Thyroid Blocking
INES International Nuclear and Radiological Event ScaleRDD / RED / IND Radiological Dispersal Device / Radiological Exposure Device / Improvised Nuclear DevicePWR / LWR Pressurised / Light Water Reactor
KNRA Kenya Nuclear Regulatory AuthorityNuPEA Nuclear Power and Energy AgencyNEPIO Nuclear Energy Programme Implementing Organisation
NRA Nuclear Regulatory Act 2019NDRM(A) National Disaster Risk Management (Act / Authority)NDOC National Disaster Operations Centre
NERP National Emergency Response Plan 2020CBRN Chemical, Biological, Radiological, NuclearKNRR Kenya Nuclear Research Reactor
ToR / MoU / SOP Terms of Reference / Memorandum of Understanding / Standard Operating ProcedurePFM Public Finance Management ActREPPIR Radiation (Emergency Preparedness and Public Information) Regulations (UK)
Hp(10) Personal dose equivalent at 10 mm depthTSC / EOF Technical Support Centre / Emergency Operations FacilityKNH Kenyatta National Hospital

Before you present: consistency & fact checks

Found while reading the decks side by side. Fixing or preparing for these removes the easiest openings for challenge.

  1. Convention status conflict. Deck 1 S7 says Kenya is not party to the Early Notification and Assistance Conventions ("accession in progress"). Deck 2 S5 says treaty status is unverified, and S15 has "confirm treaty status". Use one position in both decks.
  2. Operations centre name. Deck 1 S58 says "NDRMA / NEOC", while Deck 2 S9 says "NDOC". Use one name.
  3. Operator named as KenGen (Deck 1 S58). Confirm the NPP owner or operator has been formally designated. If not, say "the future licensee".
  4. UPZ distance (Deck 1 S36) shows "5–30 km". IAEA guidance for large reactors typically suggests a UPZ radius of 15–30 km. Be ready to say "extends to 30 km", or change the slide.
  5. Safe distance for a suspected dispersal device (Deck 1 S39) is given as 300 m. The IAEA first-responder manual commonly gives 400 m for a suspected bomb and 300 m for a fire or explosion involving a dangerous source. Check against the cited source.
  6. Unattributed quotes on Deck 1 S5 and S29. Know the source in case someone asks.
  7. "Part B" and "Part F" references (Deck 1 S40, S50). The outline slide doesn't use part letters, so the audience may be confused. Consider "earlier" instead.
  8. Category V has no Kenya application or status (Deck 1 S10), while the other four categories do. Add one line or be ready to explain (see Q&A).
  9. "Three S's" (Deck 1 S29) is never defined. Say "safety, security and safeguards".
  10. Deck 2 S16 notes say "then read the quote", but no quote text was found on the slide. Add it or drop the cue.
  11. Timings from US practice (TSC 30 min, EOF 1 h, 15/15/60 min, 1 R/h) are flagged "US practice" on the slides. Keep that label when speaking so they aren't taken as Kenyan requirements.
  12. 2015 good practices (Deck 2 S6): present them as foundations to reconfirm, not current findings.
  13. Say the review date (30 August 2026) at the start of Module 2. Law or gazette changes after that date are not reflected.